This may be a silly question, but I truly don’t know. I know that I need to have an Orthodox conversion to be considered completely "Jewish", but no one ever specifies about after the conversion. After an Orthodox conversion is complete, do I have to remain Orthodox or can I be Conservative or Reform?
When a person converts, they have to stnd before the Beis Din, Rabbinical court, and make a declaration that they intend to follow ALL the halachah; the "light" laws as well as the "heavy" laws. If the person is not beng sincere in making the declaration in that they do not intend to follow the laws, their is no conversion- thus if after the fact it turns out the person made the declaraion falsely, the Beis Din has the option to claim that the conversion never happened and to declare it null and void.
If someone doe snot intend to live as an Orthodox Jew, they should not get an Orthodox conversion. Even if they went through the whole process and got the shtar geirus (conversion document) and the Beis Din did not nullify the conversion when it became apparent the person was insincere; the person would be judged for their action in the world to come. The fist instance would be the false oath, the second would be for every mitzvah they did not keep, a far more severe form of judging than if they had just been honest up front!
powered by Yahoo Answers
April 03 2010 | 7 | 2 Comments »
What does the grey facebook chat icon that is a hollowed out grey circle mean. It looks like an o but its grey. I know a regular grey circle is offline, but this one is like hollowed out and grey. It looks just like an o.
it’s mean people currently not online (offline).same meaning as grey circle.
powered by Yahoo Answers
April 01 2010 | Icon | 3 Comments »
With all of the drama in the Irish catholic priests and bishops, it leads me to wonder how the catholic(for lack of better words) "rank structure" works. Priests, Bishops, Cardinals… I don’t really understand how it all works and I am very curious. Anyways, thanks alot!
Pretty well.
The hierarchy of the Catholic Church looks like this.
1. God
2. The Church, the People of God love and serve the Lord
3. Deacons serve God and the People of God
4. Priests serve God, the People of God, and the deacons
5. Bishops serve God, the local Church (the diocese, the People of God, the deacons, and the priests)
6. The Pope serves God and the entire Church (the People of God, the deacons, the priests, and the bishops). This is why the Pope is called the servant of the servants of God.
Men who become Pope serve in lower and lower roles until they are the servants of everyone.
The hierarchy of ordained ministers in the Catholic Church mirrors how Jesus and the Apostles set up the original Christian Church. There are three levels of Holy Orders, Deacon, Priest, and Bishop.
Deacons serve the Church by assisting the bishop and priests in the celebration of the Eucharist, in the distribution of Holy Communion, in assisting at and blessing marriages, in the proclamation of the Gospel and preaching, in presiding over funerals, and in dedicating themselves to the various ministries of charity.
Priests serve the Church as co-workers of the bishops and can lead a parish. A special title for a priest is monsignor. Priests are called presbyters in the Bible.
Bishops are the Apostles of today. Each bishop serves the Church by leading a diocese which a group of parishes centered around a large city. Special types of bishop are archbishop, cardinal, and pope (who leads the whole Church).
For more information, see the Catechism of the Catholic Church: http://www.usccb.org/catechism/text/pt2sect2chpt3.shtml#iii
With love in Christ.
powered by Yahoo Answers
March 30 2010 | Catholic | 10 Comments »
I know that Catholic is a branch in Christianity but there has to be a reason why they are separated?
What is that difference?
The 1st C Christian church was Catholic as noted by Ignatius of Antioch, 1st c. A.D:
"Where the Bishop is, there let the multitude be; even as where Jesus is, there is the Catholic Church” (Greek: Katholicos Ekklesia).
Some people who want to deny the history of Christianity will say that the Catholic Church did not exist until the 4th C with Constantine. This is an error. It is true that Constantine’s Edict of Rome that allowed religious freedom that stopped the killings and persecution. By then the Catholic (Christian) church had grown very large.
There were four popes in the 1st C alone: Peter, Linus (mentioned in the Bible), Anacletus and Clement. The first 22 popes were martyred. By the time of Constantine, there had been 30 popes.
Constantine himself was baptized Arian, not Christian, but he allowed religious freedom. He died in 337 AD. About 380, Emperor Theodosius I named Christianity (the Catholic Church) the religion of the land.
The Catholic Church has remained in a continuous line for 2000 years since the time of Christ. There are no denominations, just one unified church under the pope. The Orthodox left the church in 1054 AD over an argument with the pope, but because they took the original bible, priesthood and sacraments with them, they have remained very similar to their Catholic mother church.
During the Protestant Reformation, they rejected the priesthood, sacraments and doctrine of 1600 years of Christianity and invented new doctrine that never existed before. They now number 20-30,000 different denominations. Their beliefs follow doctrine of men, not the bible. The Catholic Church kept to the biblical teachings. For example, the Reformation stated that you are saved by "faith alone." The Bible says, "you are not saved by faith alone." The Reformation stated "once-saved-always-saved" yet the Bible does not say this — in many verses it says that a believer can lose their faith.
Protestants like to refer to themselves as Christian, yet they are actually in rebellion against Christianity by the name "protestant." (See OT Numbers 16 for what happened to other children of God who rebelled against God’s teachings.)
I just answered another question on Catholic basics, if you are interested in more information:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Algxxk70pmvakBoy3JNlYWfsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20100314231606AAC6u33&show=7#profile-info-b2Ckfmvuaa
If you would like to learn about the early Catholic Church, read "the Early Church Fathers" (available at Amazon) which are the writings of the 1st & 2nd C disciplines. You will begin to see that they are describing what the Catholic Church is today.
God bless…
<)))><
powered by Yahoo Answers
March 22 2010 | Catholic | 17 Comments »
Who is the believer?
How might these Christian teachings influence the actions of a believer?
zebronke: HAHA. crusades? witch burnings? lulz.
Wake up.
To answer your question. They won’t. Zebronke just proved it. Most christians know nothing about their own religion. They are just in it because someone told them to be.
powered by Yahoo Answers
March 22 2010 | Christian | 4 Comments »
Media player is installed in my computer but I have no icon for it. Can anyone tell me just how to make an icon for it. Thank; you.
Find the program in the start menu. Look under all programs if it is not there when you first open the start menu. Right click on it and put the cursor on sent to. Left click create desktop shortcut. Hope this helps. Good Luck.
powered by Yahoo Answers
March 22 2010 | Icon | 1 Comment »
Does this mean you took the time to investigate other religions, bibles, theories, science, history and then made an informed decision, you looked at everything in depth and then decided your bible is the one?
The absolute authority outside the many things that Jesus taught and did that were not written down are no longer available to us. We do not have the manuscripts written down by the writers. We have copies of copies of copies from the days before photo machines. A few Aramaic, probably the language written in. A lot of Greek, many of which are translations from other languages. I even heard that there are some in Armenian.
As with deciding about global warming, I read the popular literature, I mistrust the newspapers, and I read some formal presentations by scientists to Congress. I do not read original science published in journals because that doesn’t help me. I compare the scientific politics of global warming to plate tectonics. I rely on my judgment honed by an undergraduate education with alot of physics and chemistry and a great high school biology class.
So, I have parallel bibles. I have read the translation philosophies. I have read book reviews by knowledgeable people. I know what liberal protestants recommend. I know what is used in seminaries and colleges. I know of the fondness people have for the KJV. I have studied the history of Catholic Bibles in English.
Completely examined? no. Thoughtfully informed?I think I am.
Once you are past the Christianity of a child, in order to have an adult faith, or to make an informed rejection of Christianity, a sound knowledge of the Bible is required. There is alot of material out there, but with a good guide you won’t read so many duplicate articles and can stick to the well thought out ones and skip the dross.
Oh, one other safeguard, I don’t pick one. Three that are similar. NRSV, NAB, New Jerusalem Bible. I also have the Gospels and Psalms translated to a gender neutral English. And I have the Five Books of Moses translated by Robert Alter.
powered by Yahoo Answers
March 18 2010 | Bible | 10 Comments »
I’m in Australia & would love to have a garden wedding, but would also like a GOP to perform the ceremony, due to my religion. Has anyone else that’s Greek Orthodox been married out of the church with an Orthodox priest?
Generally no. You’ll have to ask your priest.
powered by Yahoo Answers
March 18 2010 | Uncategorized | 5 Comments »
I am catholic and my fiance is methodist. We are getting married in a non catholic church. And I didnt know if I could get it witnessed under the Catholic church.
He can witness it as a friend, but not as an official of the Church.
As a Catholic you should be married in a Catholic Church. The local bishop can permit a wedding in another church, or in another suitable place, for a sufficient reason. You need to talk to a priest to find out if you meet the criteria for the "sufficient reason."
powered by Yahoo Answers
March 18 2010 | Catholic | 6 Comments »
What contribtutions did the Protestant and Catholic missionaries make to the Pacific Northwest? Which methods of missionary work were similar and which were different between Protestant and Catholic missionaries?
try to research about it at wikipedia encyclopedia.
powered by Yahoo Answers
March 16 2010 | Protestant | 3 Comments »
« Prev - Next »
